|
The Trinity in the Old
Testament
Some people are under the misunderstanding that the Trinity
is not found in the Old Testament. Some of our Jewish friends
and even gentile friends are 'mildly' to 'extremely' offended
by the concept of the Trinity.
What I intend on doing is walking us through the Old
Testament and demonstrating that the Trinity, or Triune-ity, is
clearly taught throughout the Old Testament. First we will
refute a misconception, then go in step order of proof ie Proof
1, Proof 2 Proof 3......I will try to make it as simple as
possible but say a prayer that God will give you a spirit of
wisdom and revelation...
The Doctrine of the Trinity is that God "exists" in three
distinct persons: God the Father God the Son God the Holy
Spirit
REFUTATION
The most frequently quoted verse in the Old Testament that
used to supposedly 'refute' the trinity concept is found in
what the Jews call the SHEMA:
CJB Deuteronomy
6:4 "Sh'ma, Yisra'el! ADONAI Eloheinu,
ADONAI echad [Hear, Isra'el! ADONAI our God, ADONAI is
one];
NAU Deuteronomy 6:4
"aHear, O Israel! The LORD is our God, the
bLORD is one!
The word in
question is the word "ONE"
First the Scholarly stuff:
61.0
dx;a,
(°eµad)
one, same, single, first, each, once,
fem.
°aµat
(
tx;a;
). It is pronounced "ech-ad"
This word occurs 960 times as a noun, adjective, or adverb, as
a cardinal or ordinal number, often used in a distributive
sense. It is closely identified with
y¹µad
"to be united" and with
rϡsh
"first, head," especially in connection with the "first day" of
the month (Gen 8:13). It stresses
unity
while recognizing diversity within that
oneness.
Ok so we see that the word we are dealing with, "ech-ad" is
used in a few different ways; but we see it speaks of
ONENESS and stresses
UNITY
while recognizing DIVERSITY within.
Let us now let the Scriptures speak for themselves, and
enlighten us as to the clear teaching of the Old Testament; and
if anyone has eyes to see and ears to hear let God,
the Holy Spirit speak to us and give clarity and
understanding.
Taking first the SHEMA
NAU Deuteronomy 6:4
"aHear, O
Israel! The LORD is our God, the bLORD is
one
"Sh'ma, Yisra'el!
ADONAI Eloheinu, ADONAI
echad [Hear, Isra'el! ADONAI our God, ADONAI
is one];
“the Lord, our God, the Lord,
one.”
(1) One option is to translate:
“The Lord is our God, the Lord alone”
(cf. NAB, NRSV, NLT). This would be an affirmation that
the Lord was the sole object of their
devotion. This interpretation finds support from
the appeals to loyalty that follow (vv. 5,
14).
(2) Another option is to
translate: “The Lord is our God, the Lord is
unique.”
In this case the text would be
affirming the people’s allegiance to the Lord, as well as
the Lord’s superiority to all other
gods. It would also imply that he is the only
one worthy of their
worship.
Support for this view comes from
parallel texts such as Deut 7:9 and 10:17, as well as the
use of “one” in Song 6:8-9, where the starstruck lover
declares that his beloved is unique (literally, “one,”
that is, “one of a kind”) when compared
to all other women. By the way, that is what our
Lord Jesus Christ is called-the only-begotten or UNIQUELY
ONE OF A KIND Son of God.
There are many scriptures that
confirm the ONENESS of our God-The following are a
few of them. Read them and meditate on them and the Holy
Spirit will make it very very clear what ONENESS means in
these scriptures....He is the sole object of
their devotion and one of a
kind and superior to any
so-called god.
CJB Exodus 8:6 He answered, "Tomorrow." Moshe said,
"It will be as you have said, and from this you will learn that
ADONAI our God has no equal.
CJB Exodus 9:14 For
this time, I will inflict my plagues on you, yourself, and on
your officials and your people; so that you will realize that I
am without equal in all the earth.
CJB 1 Samuel
2:2 "No one is as holy as ADONAI, because there is
none to compare with you, no rock like our God.
CJB 1 Kings
8:23 and said, "ADONAI, God of Isra'el, there is no
God like you in heaven above or on earth below. You keep
covenant with your servants and show them grace, provided they
live in your presence with all their heart.
CJB 2 Kings 18:5 He
put his trust in ADONAI the God of Isra'el; after him there was
no one like him among all the kings of Y'hudah, nor had there
been among those before him.
CJB Isaiah
44:6 Thus says ADONAI, Isra'el's King and Redeemer,
ADONAI-Tzva'ot: "I am the first, and I am the last;
besides me there is no God.
JB Jeremiah
10:6 There is no one like you, ADONAI! You are great,
and your name is great and mighty.
So we all can agree that the meaning of the
word "ech-ad" ONE in Deut. 6:4 is either
ALONE or UNIQUE... ie
that God Alone is to be worshipped and He
is Unique above all so-called
gods.
Does this contradict what I believe as a
Christian about God? Not at all..I believe the same thing as
our Jewish friends.
1. My God is ONE-He is the sole
object of my total devotion.
2. My God is Unique and
Superior to all the other so-called-gods, and
is the only one worthy of my
worship.
I worship the God of
Israel!!!
So we are in total agreement. But
this verse in no way at all refutes the concept of the
TRINITY.
**************************************
Let us proceed by examining other
scriptures containing the word ONE- (ech-ad) the exact
Hebrew word used in Deut. 6:4
In other words here is the
question: Can God be One and still be ONE? Let's
take a look.
Because the Triune God we believe
in implies Plurality can we find Plurality in this word
"ech-ad?" Lets take a look at these specific scriptures
containing the same exact Hebrew word:
NAU Genesis 2:24
aFor this
reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and
be joined to his wife; and they shall become
one (ech-ad
) flesh. Here
God is saying the Two becomes One in the instance of
marriage.
This is a clear teaching of
compound unity in this word ONE. Would you agree
with me that God just said TWO are
ONE?
Let's go to another useage of ONE
(ech-ad) NAU Genesis 11:1 Now the whole
earth 1used the same (ech-ad)
language and 2the same (ech-ad)
words.
Go ahead and translate it
literally: Now the whole earth used ONE language and ONE
words. Doesn't make sense does it? That is because this
useage of (ech-ad) ONE, carries with the idea of
"compound plurality" in ONENESS. So here again One
means Many words
right?
Let's go to another
one:
NAU Genesis 11:6 The LORD said,
"Behold, they are one (ech-ad) people, and they all have
1athe
same (ech-ad) language. And this is what they began to
do, and now nothing which they purpose to do will be
2impossible for
them.
God says that many people are One
(ech-ad) and they have many words which He calls One
(ech-ad). Many people equal ONE...and Many words equals
ONE. Are we beginning to get the
picture?
Here are
more:
Genesis 34:16
then we will give our daughters to you, and we will take
your daughters for ourselves, and we will
1live with you and become one (ech-ad)
people.
NAU Exodus 24:3 Then Moses came and recounted to
the people all the words of the LORD and all the
1ordinances; and all the people answered with one
(ech-ad) voice and said, "aAll the words which the
LORD has spoken we will do!"
As you can plainly see this word
ONE (ech-ad) not only can mean sole or
alone and
unique but also can
have a sense of Compound Unity, according to
the context it is
used.
So I think this more than
adequately answers the questions raised by some from the
SHEMA--Deut.
6:4.
Before we move on I want to also
stress the idea of DIVERSITY within
UNITY which can also be implied in this
word. So we see in this
word:
COMPOUND
UNITY- PLURALITY-
DIVERSITY...The
very aspects we see in the Triune God, God consisting in
three distinct persons. So let's proceed
**************************************
PROOF
1
The use of the Word 'ELOHIM'
(el-o-him) for
God.
NAU Genesis 1:1 In the
beginning God (el-o-him) created the heavens and the
earth.
(Ok, here comes some scholarly stuff--bear
with me)
Here we find in the very first verse of the
Bible the word for God used is 'ELOHIM'
(el-o-him) which is in
the plural form instead of the word ELOAH (el-o-ah) which is
the singular form. Why this is important is that it is used
with singular verbs and
pronouns.
*ELOHIM
(el-o-him) is in the plural form and is used
with verbs and pronouns that are in the Singular
form.
According to
the Hebrew scholars:
1.
This form has
been called the “plural of
majesty” or the “intensive plural”
because it implies
that all the
fullness of deity is concentrated in the one
god. Elohim
being the most common word for God in the OT thus conveys
this idea. Some have also thought that the frequent use
of Elohim
emphasizes that God is not intrinsically monistic but
includes within
Himself plurality of powers, attributes, and
personhood.” [Bromiley, Geoffrey W.
The International
Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Revised, Vol. 2,
Page 505-506. Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1988;
2002.]
2.
“The
plural ending is usually described as a
plural of
majesty and not intended as a true plural
when used of God. This is seen in the fact that the
noun elohim is consistently used with
singular verb forms and with adjectives and pronouns in
the singularAge to
Christianity, 2d ed., p.
213).
But a better reason can be seen in Scripture itself where, in
the very first chapter of Gen, the necessity of a
term
conveying both the
unity
of the one God and yet allowing for a
plurality of
persons is found (Gen 1:2,26). This is
further borne out by the fact that the
form elohim
occurs only
in Hebrew and in no
other Semitic language, not even in Biblical
Aramaic (Gustav F.
Oehler, Theology of the Old
Testament, p.
88).” [Harris, R. L., Harris, R. L., Archer, G. L., &
Waltke, B. K. (1999, c1980). Theological Wordbook of the Old
Testament (electronic ed.) (Page 044).
Chicago: Moody
Press.]
So as we can see the plural form of this word
may be
regarded:
(1) as intensive to indicate
God's fullness of power
(2) as majestic to indicate
God's Kingly
Rule
(3) as an allusion to the
Trinity. (Gen
1:26)
(The Complete Word Study Dictionary
This is from the Theological Wordbook of the
Old Testament (TWOT)
More
probable is the view that °§lœhîm
comes
from °§lœah as a unique development
of the Hebrew Scriptures and represents chiefly the
plurality of persons in the Trinity of the godhead
(see °§lœhîm
).
PROOF 2
Our second proof
is the very unusual "US" verses in
Scripture:
* JPS Genesis 1:26 And God said: 'Let us
make man in our image, after our likeness; and let them have
dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the
air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over
every creeping thing that creepeth upon the
earth.'
Wow!!! "Let
us...our image" In the creation of man (El-o-him, plural) said
"Let us (plural) make man in our (plural) image. So there ws
plurality in the Godhead
during CREATION.
Is God including
the angelic hosts as co-creators of man? May it never
be!!!
* CJB Genesis 3:22 ADONAI, God,
said, "See, the man has become like one of
us, knowing good and evil. Now, to
prevent his putting out his hand and taking also from the
tree of life, eating, and living forever - "
Could this "us" be His inclusion
of angelic hosts? If so He is saying that Angels are of
the same essence as Himself. Never!!!
* Genesis 11:7 Come, let
us go down, and there confound their
language, that they may not understand one another's
speech.'
*
CJB Isaiah 6:8 Then I heard the
voice of Adonai saying, "Whom should I send? Who
will go for us?" I answered, "I'm here,
send me!"
Isn't it obvious that when "us" is used with God
that it is clearly speaking of the triune Godhead? What
are the alternatives.
Speaking of Creation, Would the all wise, all
knowing, all powerful God would need to call on the
angelic hosts to accomplish the act of creation? He
created the hosts of heaven.
Who would the God of Majesty consult with or solicit
advice from any of His creation before He did
anything?
These scriptures alone surely point the the Triune
God of the Bible.
I think we can
see that the use of the plural (el-o-him) along with the use of
(us), suggests either the divine
majesty or that fullness of his being that was to find its
ultimate theological expression in the doctrine of the
Trinity.
It is interesting
that even the Rabbi's recognized that Gen 1.26 was support for
the triunity of God. In the Midrash Rabbah on
Genesis:
Rabbi Samuel bar Nahman in the
name of Rabbi Jonathan said, that at the time when Moses wrote
the Torah; writing a portion of it daily, when he came to this
verse which says, "And Elohim said let us make man in our image
after our likeness," Moses said, Master of the Universe why do
you give herewith an excuse to the sectarians (who believe in
the triunity of God)? God answered Moses, You write and whoever
wants to err let him err.
Also, there is a long passage
in the Talmud (Jers., Ber. 12d, 13a) dealing with the problems
of the singular-plural combinations in single texts; most
explanations of which are really non-answers. The participants
in the discussion point out several such verses, including Josh
24.19--"for He is a holy (plural) God"!
PROOF 3
The manifestations of God in
the Scriptures:
* The Angel of the Lord
Most of you are familiar with the story of Abraham (still
called Abram), Sarai and her servant Hagar. Anyway to help God
along in His plan to bless Abraham with the promised seed,
Sarai insisted that Abraham take Hagar to produce a child since
she, herself, was barren.
Well when Hagar conceived, Sarai resented her and treated
her harshly so she fled from Sarai into the wilderness. Here is
where we pick up the story...
Genesis 16:7-16 7 Now the
Angel of the
LORD found her by a spring of water in
the wilderness, by the spring on the way to Shur.
8 And He
said, "Hagar, Sarai's maid, where have you come from, and
where are you going?" She said, "I am fleeing from the
presence of my mistress Sarai." 9 The Angel of the LORD
said to her, "Return to your mistress, and submit
yourself under her hand." 10 Then the
Angel of the
LORD said to her, "I will multiply your
descendants exceedingly, so that they shall not be
counted for multitude." 11 And the Angel of the
LORD said to her: "Behold, you are with child, And you
shall bear a son. You shall call his name Ishmael,
Because the LORD (YHVH-Jehovah) has
heard your affliction. 12 He shall be a wild man;
His hand shall
be against every man, And every man's hand
against him. And he shall dwell in the presence of all
his brethren." 13 Then she called the
name of the LORD who spoke to her,
You-Are-the-God-Who-Sees;
for she said, "Have I also here seen Him who sees me?"
14
Therefore the well was called Beer Lahai Roi; observe,
it is between
Kadesh and Bered. 15 So Hagar bore Abram a
son; and Abram named his son, whom Hagar bore, Ishmael.
16 Abram
was
eighty-six years old when Hagar bore Ishmael to
Abram.
Notice:
-
This angel promises to
'increase the descendants'--a promise only GOD
makes
-
This angel is called YHWH by the
writer.
-
This angel is called God by
Hagar.
-
This angel refers to the LORD in the 3rd person
Now let me ask you a simple question. How in the world could
you explain this passage without agreeing that there has to be
the concept of plurality in the Godhead. Over and over in
scriptures we are confronted with a Person who is referred to
as God, or acts exactly like God, but He refers to God in the
third person as being someone else?
All these passages could not
possibly be explained except by the doctrine of the
Triune-God....God manifesting Himself in three
persons.
**************************************
Lets examine Genesis
18-19
First verses
1-3
Gen 18:1 And
Jehovah appeared to him in the plains of
Mamre, and he sat at the tent door in the heat of the day.
Gen 18:2 And he lifted up his eyes and looked, and lo,
three men stood by him. And when he saw them,
he ran to meet them from the
tent door, and bowed toward the ground. Gen
18:3 And he said, My Lord, if now I have
found favor in Your sight, do not pass away, I pray, from Your
servant.
v1. Jehovah (YHVH) Himself
appears to Abraham
v2. Three men (this word for
men stresses male gender not humanity. But we see three distinct males
appearing.
v2. Abraham ran with haste to
them (plural)-someone extremely important.
v2. Abraham bowed down
(TO PROSTRATE ONESELF, TO DO
REVERENCE, TO DO WORSHIP).
v3. Abraham called the three men
"My Lord" (a-don; root of Adonai). This word 'Lord' means
Lord or Master and carries with it the nuance of
'Authority;' also, when it is used with Jehovah
(v1) it means SOVEREIGN.
To me this looks like a
perfect picture of the Trinity how about you? God in three
persons blessed Trinity.
Secondly verses 17-19
Gen 18:17 And Jehovah
said, Shall I hide from Abraham the thing which I
do, Gen
18:18 And Abraham shall surely become a great and
mighty nation, and all the persons of the earth shall be
blessed in him? Gen 18:19 For I know him, that he
will command his sons and his house after him, and they
shall keep the way of Jehovah, to do justice and judgment,
that Jehovah may bring upon Abraham that which
He has spoken of him
-
First of all, in these passages, this figure
presented to us as Jehovah is not directly called
the "angel of the LORD" but later on two of them
are called "angels"
-
This figure represented to us is called Jehovah
(YHVH)
-
This figure refers to Jehovah (YHWY) in the third
person
-
This figure says He Himself Chose Abraham-we know
that choosing (election) is done by God
Himself...it is Divine prerogative.
-
This passage and on to chapter 19 following the
acts of the two men, refer from singular to plural
and from plural to singular-which points obviously
to the fact that all three of these men ie angels
were Jehovah (YHVH)
Gen
19:24 Then Jehovah rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah
brimstone and fire, from Jehovah out of the heavens.
Stong evidence for Triune God wouldn't you say?
More tomorrow Thanks to the Christian Think-Tank
**************************************
Gen 21
But God said to him, "Do not be so distressed about the boy
and your maidservant. Listen to whatever Sarah tells you,
because it is through Isaac that your offspring will be
reckoned. I will make the son of the maidservant into a nation
also, because he is your offspring." Early the next morning
Abraham took some food and a skin of water and gave them to
Hagar. He set them on her shoulders and then sent her off with
the boy. She went on her way and wandered in the desert of
Beersheba. When the water in the skin was gone, she put the boy
under one of the bushes. Then she went off and sat down nearby,
about a bowshot away, for she thought, "I cannot watch the boy
die." And as she sat there nearby, she began to sob. God heard
the boy crying, and the angel of God called to Hagar from
heaven and said to her, "What is the matter, Hagar? Do not be
afraid; God has heard the boy crying as he lies there. Lift the
boy up and take him by the hand, for I will make him into a
great nation."
Notice:
-
God repeats the promise
of This angel in the Gen 16 passage
-
The Angel repeats the
promise of God as HIS OWN promise
-
This angel refers to God
in the 3rd person.
-
The angel speaks 'from heaven'--there is no need for
a 'representative' in this case. (If the angel is NOT
YHWH, then this scene is certainly misleading!)
**************************************
Gen 22
But the angel of the LORD called out to him from heaven,
"Abraham! Abraham!" Here I am," he replied. "Do not lay a hand
on the boy," he said. "Do not do anything to him. Now I know
that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your
son, your only son." Abraham looked up and there in a thicket
he saw a ram caught by its horns. He went over and took the ram
and sacrificed it as a burnt offering instead of his son. So
Abraham called that place The LORD Will Provide. And to this
day it is said, "On the mountain of the LORD it will be
provided." The angel of the LORD called to Abraham from heaven
a second time and said, "I swear by myself, declares the LORD,
that because you have done this and have not withheld your son,
your only son, I will surely bless you and make your
descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and as the sand
on the seashore. Your descendants will take possession of the
cities of their enemies, and through your offspring all nations
on earth will be blessed, because you have obeyed me."
Notice:
-
The Angel says Abraham
did not withhold his son from Himself, even though it
was God who ordered it (22.2)
-
This "non-withholding"
clause identifies the Angel with the YHWH of the "I
swear by myself" passage
-
This angel refers to
'God' and 'YHWH' in the 3rd person.
-
The angel repeats the
blessing that had been previously uttered by YHWH and
by the Angel (Gen 16, 21)
-
The angel speaks 'from heaven'--there is no need for
a 'representative' in this case. (If the angel is NOT
YHWH, then this scene is certainly misleading!)
**************************************
Gen 31
The angel of God said to me in the dream, 'Jacob.' I
answered, 'Here I am.' And he said, 'Look up and see that all
the male goats mating with the flock are streaked, speckled or
spotted, for I have seen all that Laban has been doing to you.
I am the God of Bethel, where you anointed a pillar and where
you made a vow to me. Now leave this land at once and go back
to your native land.' "
Notice:
**************************************
Exodus 3
There the angel of the LORD appeared to him in flames of
fire from within a bush. Moses saw that though the bush was on
fire it did not burn up. So Moses thought, "I will go over and
see this strange sight --why the bush does not burn up." When
the LORD saw that he had gone over to look, God called to him
from within the bush, "Moses! Moses!" And Moses said, "Here I
am." "Do not come any closer," God said. "Take off your
sandals, for the place where you are standing is holy ground."
Then he said, "I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham,
the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob." At this, Moses hid his
face, because he was afraid to look at God.
Notice:
-
The Angel of God calls
HIMSELF the "God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob"
-
The writer calls the Angel "God"
Exodus 13:21-22 with 14:19-20
By day the LORD went ahead of them in a pillar of cloud to
guide them on their way and by night in a pillar of fire to
give them light, so that they could travel by day or night.
Neither the pillar of cloud by day nor the pillar of fire by
night left its place in front of the people.
Then the angel of God, who had been traveling in front of
Israel's army, withdrew and went behind them. The pillar of
cloud also moved from in front and stood behind them, coming
between the armies of Egypt and Israel. Throughout the night
the cloud brought darkness to the one side and light to the
other side; so neither went near the other all night long.
Notice:
**************************************
Numbers 22:34-35 with 22:38 and 23:12
Balaam said to the angel of the LORD, "I have sinned. I did
not realize you were standing in the road to oppose me. Now if
you are displeased, I will go back." The angel of the LORD said
to Balaam, "Go with the men, but speak only what I tell you."
So Balaam went with the princes of Balak.
"Well, I have come to you now," Balaam replied. "But can I
say just anything? I must speak only what God puts in my
mouth."
He answered, "Must I not speak what the LORD puts in my
mouth?"
Notice:
Judges 2.1-4
The angel of the LORD went up from Gilgal to Bokim and said,
"I brought you up out of Egypt and led you into the land that I
swore to give to your forefathers. I said, 'I will never break
my covenant with you, and you shall not make a covenant with
the people of this land, but you shall break down their
altars.' Yet you have disobeyed me. Why have you done this? Now
therefore I tell you that I will not drive them out before you;
they will be thorns in your sides and their gods will be a
snare to you." When the angel of the LORD had spoken these
things to all the Israelites, the people wept aloud, and they
called that place Bokim. There they offered sacrifices to the
LORD.
Notice:
**************************************
I Chron 21
And God sent an angel to
destroy Jerusalem. But as the angel was doing so, the LORD saw
it and was grieved because of the calamity and said to the
angel who was destroying the people, "Enough! Withdraw your
hand." The angel of the LORD was then standing at the threshing
floor of Araunah the Jebusite.
Notice:
Other
Passages:
(1) In the Gideon story (Judg
6), one reads "and the angel of the Lord appeared to him"
(v12), and a little later , "and YAHWEH turned to him and said"
(v14). In v.22 Gideon equates the two.
(2) Ten times "the angel of
YHWH" appears in Judges 13 (and "the angel of God" two times,
v6,9) to announce the birth of Samson. Toward the end of the
narrative Manoah exclaims, "we shall surely die, for we have
seen God" (v22).
Pushback: "Glenn, the word
for ANGEL is the same word translated 'messenger' elsewhere. So
all those passages in which the ANGEL speaks as YHWH (in the
1st person) could simply be short forms of a message from Yhwh,
WITHOUT the "thus says the Lord"
clause.
For example, Glenn, the
passage in Gen 22 that you cite has the Angel saying the LONG
form:
The angel of the LORD called
to Abraham from heaven a second time and said, "I swear by
myself, declares the LORD, that because you have done this and
have not withheld your son, your only son, I will surely bless
you and make your descendants as numerous..
Here we have the Angel
speaking with an "I swear" but adding quickly "declares the
Lord". This would form the general pattern of all the later OT
prophets, who consistently spoke as YHWH in the 1st person, but
ALWAYS qualified it by "declares the Lord". So why couldn't the
Angel's messages be simply shortened forms of prophetic
utterances, and so not leading us to believe he was claiming to
be/acting like YHWH?"
Response: The angel IS often a messenger, but the main
reasons I don't find this objection strong enough to overturn
the original arguments:
1. 'Short forms' in the OT are
exceptionally rare (Is 11.9?) so why would we believe there was
such a thing? The prophets were VERY CAREFUL to make it clear
it was the word of THE LORD!
2. My argument in Gen 22
hinged upon the 'withheld' clause and not from the form of the
blessing pronouncement.
3. The passages had OTHER
means of identifying the Angel with YHWH than JUST the
pronouncements--the response of the humans, the actions of the
Angel, more explicit identifications (esp. Ex
3).
4. Whoever did the
'collapsing' (the editor/author/compiler) obviously was not
that hyper-sensitive to what types of 'pluritarian' heresy
he/she would generate! To a unitarian monotheism, these
'tensions' would have been glaring. [Compare the rabbinic story
of how God rebuked Solomon for using a three-fold 'holy, holy,
holy', and forced him to write Ecc 4.8, due to such
sensitivities! (Debar r. ii. 33, also Bamm. r. xvi.
14)]
So the objection seems weaker
and less substantial than does the original
argument.
Summary: The Angel of the LORD is both God and yet
refers to someone else as God. (If we don't believe there are
TWO gods, I think we are 'locked into' developing some kind of
plurality-within-unity concept.) This figure is beyond the
normal angels and indeed is somehow SPECIALLY linked to the
'being' of God--He is called the angel of "His presence" (Is
63.9) , the angel with God's "Name" in Him (Ex 23:20-23), and
is placed in a parallel construction with God's action in Zech
12.8 ("and the house of David will be like God, like the Angel
of the LORD going before them.").
Thanks to the Christian Think-Tank
**************************************
Proof
4
THE SPIRIT OF
GOD
Let's look at some passages that
manifest some sort of 'distinction' between God and
His Spirit (e.g. sending, putting, withdrawing,
giving)
Gen 1
In the beginning God created
the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and
empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the
Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
Num 11:29
But Moses replied, "Are you
jealous for my sake? I wish that all the LORD's people were
prophets and that the LORD would put his Spirit on
them!"
Neh. 9:20
You gave your good Spirit to
instruct them. You did not withhold your manna from their
mouths, and you gave them water for their thirst.
Ps. 51:11
Do not cast me from your
presence or take your Holy Spirit from me.
Ps. 104:30
When you send your Spirit,
they are created, and you renew the face of the
earth.
Isa. 32:15
till the Spirit is poured upon
us from on high, and the desert becomes a fertile field, and
the fertile field seems like a forest.
Isa. 42:1
"Here is my servant, whom I
uphold, my chosen one in whom I delight; I will put my Spirit
on him and he will bring justice to the nations.
Isa. 48:16
"Come near me and listen to
this: From the first announcement I have not spoken in secret;
at the time it happens, I am there." And now the Sovereign LORD
has sent me, with his Spirit.
Isa. 63:11
Then his people recalled the
days of old, the days of Moses and his people -- where is he
who brought them through the sea, with the shepherd of his
flock? Where is he who set his Holy Spirit among
them,
Ezek. 36:27
And I will put my Spirit in
you and move you to follow my decrees and be careful to keep my
laws.
Hag. 2:5
'This is what I covenanted
with you when you came out of Egypt. And my Spirit remains
among you. Do not fear.'
Now, we look at some passages
that demonstrate the personal characteristics of this 'remote
Agent' of God
Neh. 9:20
You gave your good Spirit to
instruct them. You did not withhold your manna from their
mouths, and you gave them water for their thirst.
Ps. 106:33
for they rebelled against the
Spirit of God, and rash words came from Moses' lips.
Ps. 143:10
Teach me to do your will, for
you are my God; may your good Spirit lead me on level
ground.
Isa. 34:16
Look in the scroll of the LORD
and read: None of these will be missing, not one will lack her
mate. For it is his mouth that has given the order, and his
Spirit will gather them together.
Isa. 63:10
Yet they rebelled and grieved
his Holy Spirit.
Isa. 63:14
like cattle that go down to
the plain, they were given rest by the Spirit of the LORD. This
is how you guided your people to make for yourself a glorious
name.
Micah 2:7
Should it be said, O house of
Jacob: Is the Spirit of the LORD angry? Does he do such
things?" "Do not my words do good to him whose ways are
upright?
Summary: The Spirit of
God seems to be a 'dispatch-able' Agent (like the messenger
Angel), who can grieve, teach, give rest, be angry, be rebelled
against, etc. He is at the same time a 'part of' God and
'distinct from' God. Plurality-in-unity.
**************************************
Proof
5
Messiah The
King
Since it is commonly understood
that the Messiah was sent from God and ruled FOR God on
earth, and therefore was QUITE 'distinct from' God, all
that needs to be shown in this section is that the
Messiah was ALSO declared to be divine
himself.
Since it is commonly understood
that the Messiah was sent from God and ruled FOR God on earth,
and therefore was QUITE 'distinct from' God, all that needs to
be shown in this section is that the Messiah was ALSO declared
to be divine himself. There are two points I want to
demonstrate here in this regard:
First, that many of the
messianic passages were understood by non-Christian Jewish
interpreters (and therefore not even remotely suspect of
high-Christological bias!) as teaching of a super-human,
super-angelic Messiah;
Second, that at least two OT
prophesies make explicit statements about the Messiah being
YHWH.
First: that ONE of the MANY
messianic expectations of non-Christian Jewry was of a
super-human, super-angel Messiah. (For full documentation of
this, see my
Messianic Expectations in 1st Century Judaism--Documentation
from Non-Christian Sources)
The data for this position
divides into three types: pre-Christian Jewish writings, data
gleaned from the NT about Jewish expectations at the time of
Christ (which we will NOT consider, since these are in the NT),
and then from post-Christian writings (e.g. the
Rabbinix).
Pre-Christian Jewish
writings.The normal
sources that one consults here are: The Septuagint (LXX)
translation of the Hebrew OT, early portions of the Jewish
Apocrypha and Pseudepigraphix, and the documents from
Quman.
The LXX
renderings:
(1) Gen 49.10 and Num 24:7, 17
points out that the kingdom of the Messiah was higher than any
kingdom that is earthly
(2) Ps 72: 5,7: The existence
of the Messiah was pre-mundane: before the Moon and
Eternal
(3) Ps 110:3: The Messiah
existed before the morning star
(4) Is 9.6: This passage shows
that the Messiah was superior to men and angels...The 'Angel of
the Great Council' is also the 'Angel of the Face' (as the
Targum on the passage demonstrates)
The Jewish
Apocrypha is
generally silent on the entire Messianic issue (their concerns
seemed to lie elsewhere).
The Jewish
Pseudepigraphix gives us several strong
statements:
(1) Sibylline Oracles
3.285,286: the Messiah is the 'king sent from heaven' who would
'judge every man in blood and splendor of fire'.
(2) Sibylline Oracles 3.652:
the Messiah is called the "King whom God will send from the
sun".
(3) The Book of Enoch:
Variously describes the Messiah as "The Woman's Son" (62.5),
"The Son of Man" (48.2;62.7; 69.29), God's “my
son”(105.2)
(4) The Psalms of Solomon
(17-18) describe a highly developed Royal Messianic figure,
bordering on perfection of qualities.
Qumran: The group at Qumran consistently
expected a future Messiah, with 'advanced qualities', but put
much more emphasis on the human, Davidic aspects of the
Messiah. So 4QFlor 1:10-13 on 2 Sam 7.13-14 describes the
Messiah as Son of David, Son of God.
So, the pre-Christian Jewish
writings show that the belief in a pre-mundane, eternal,
super-angelic, super-human Messiah was held at least by certain
influential and literate Jewish leaders. [It is generally
accepted by scholars today that NO SINGLE understanding of the
Messiah was normative in Israel. Different groups held
different conceptions of Him, and at least ONE group did not
believe in one at all--the Sadduccees, who also denied the
existence of angels and the resurrection.]
Consider some of the scholarly
assessments of this data today:
-
[Note: from the introduction
to I
Enoch in
OTP: vol
1, 9: "The Messiah in 1 Enoch, called the Righteous One, and the
Son of Man, is depicted as a pre-existent heavenly
being who is resplendent and majestic, possesses all
dominion, and sits on his throne of glory passing
judgment upon all mortal and spiritual beings"--a human
political leader, eh?!]
-
Even the Jewish
scholar Jacob Neusner (who attempts to minimize
'traditional' notions of the messiah) readily ADMITS
that the messianic expectations of pre-Mishnahhic Jewry
WERE those of an exalted super-human figure! Neusner
believes that the compilers of the Mishnah were
attempting to resolve the same issues, but in a
different way. In describing this attempt, Neusner
gives a telling description of what the 'older'
traditions were (in "Mishnah and Messiah",
JTM:275): "We
focus upon how the system laid out in the Mishnah takes
up and disposes of those critical issues of teleology
worked out through messianic eschatology
in other,
earlier versions of
Judaism (emphasis
mine). These earlier systems resorted to the myth
of the Messiah as savior and redeemer of Israel,
a supernatural figure engaged in
political-historical tasks as king of the Jews,
even a
God-man(emphasis
mine) facing the crucial historical questions of
Israel's life and resolving them: the Christ as
king of the world, of the ages, of death
itself."
Strangely, the post-Christian
Jewish writings also have an 'super-Messiah' strain. Edersheim
(
LTJM:123) finds this
surprising:
If we now turn to works dating
after the Christian era, we would naturally expect them, either
simply to reproduce earlier opinions, or, from opposition to
Christ, to present the Messiah in a less exalted manner. But
since, strange to say, they even more strongly assert the high
dignity of the Messiah, we are warranted in regarding this as
the rooted belief of the Synagogue."
There is an immense amount of
Rabbinic data on the super-human, super-angelic character of
the Messiah, of which I can only mention a few
items:
(1) The Messiah was eternal,
created before the world, appearing in the world during the
times of Jacob, Pharaoh, Imperial Rome, etc. (Targum on Is 9.6
and Micah 5.2; Midrash on Prov 8:9; Talmud--Jer. Ber. 2.4,
p.5a; Sanh 98a; Ber. R. 85; Yalkut on Is 60)
(2) The Messiah would be
greater than the patriarchs, higher than Moses, and loftier
than the ministering angels (Tanch, Par. Toledoth 14; Midr. on
Ps 18:36) and indeed even be given God's OWN 'crown and glory'
(Midrash on Ps 21:3!).
(3) The messiah is even given
credit for the work of God in creation! (the passage "the
Spirit of God moved upon the deep"--Gen 1--is paraphrased in
three places as "This is the Spirit of King Messiah": Ber r.2,
and 8; Vayyikra R. 14)
(4) The messiah is actually
called YHWH in two passages(!)--Midrash on Lam 1.16 and on Ps
21)
The rabbinic data leads
clearly to the understanding that one MAIN belief of Israel was
that "the Messiah expected was far above the conditions of the
most exalted of God's servants, even His angels; in short, so
closely bordering on the Divine, that it was almost impossible
to distinguish Him therefrom" (
LTJM:1.179).
Second, that at least two
OT prophesies make explicit statements about the Messiah being
YHWH.
[The above material was cited
and discussed to show that the concept of a super-human,
super-angelic Messiah was NOT FOREIGN to non-Christian Jewish
understanding of the messianic passages.
IN LIGHT OF THIS
"HIGH-VIEW" of the Messiah, I now want to examine 2 OT passages
that appear to distinctly call the Messiah YHWH. I cannot be
accused of making a "human-only" Messiah into some Divine
figure (as Christians are sometimes accused). That OTHERS
accepted the Messiah as 'more than man' is adequate defense
from any such criticism in my direction.]
I wish to briefly look at two
messianic passages: Zech 12 and Mal 3.
Zech 12.10: "And I will pour
out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a
spirit of grace and supplication. They will look on ME(emphasis
mine), the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for HIM
(emphasis mine) as one mourns for an only child, and grieve
bitterly for him as one grieves for a firstborn son.
Note:
-
YHWH is speaking (He pours out the
Spirit).
-
YHWH is 'looked upon' by the
inhabitants of Jerusalem.
-
YHWH is 'pierced' by the inhabitants
of Jerusalem.
-
It switches to a 3rd person, in the
middle of the sentence(!) "mourn for HIM"
-
Remember, God the Father has NEVER
been seen, nor can be 'pierced'!
-
The verse is
understood of Messiah Son of Joseph (the suffering
messiah) in the Talmud (Sukk. 52a).
This passage has both unity
AND distinction.
Mal 3.1 (coupled with Is
40.3-5):
"See, I will send my
messenger, who will prepare the way before ME (emphasis mine).
Then suddenly the Lord you are seeking will come to his temple;
the messenger of the covenant, whom you desire, will come,"
says the LORD Almighty. (Mal)
A voice of one calling: "In
the desert prepare the way for the LORD; make straight in the
wilderness a highway for our God. 4 Every valley shall be
raised up, every mountain and hill made low; the rough ground
shall become level, the rugged places a plain. 5 And the glory
of the LORD will be revealed, and all mankind together will see
it. (Is)
These passages were considered
by the Rabbinical writers as part of a
messianic-passage-complex that included Is 35.1-10; Hosea 2.14;
and Ex 23.20.
The main thing to note here is
that the
forerunner (Elijah-->John the
Baptist) preceded
both YHWH and the Messiah...
These two passages illustrate
that the admittedly super-human/super-angelic nature of the
Messiah was that of YHWH (even though the Messiah was SENT BY
YHWH). Also, please note that in biblical cosmology, the ONLY
'being' higher than the angels is GOD HIMSELF.
To ascribe status to the
Messiah 'greater than that of angels' pushes one either to (1)
a plurality within God; or (2) postulating some completely
unknown, unrevealed, undiscussed, undisclosed higher status of
creature!.
Summary. Even the data about the King Messiah strongly
suggests a necessary plurality within God--or these texts are
highly misleading! [Remember, these kinds of passages are FULLY
predicted by trinitarianism (not explained by it, however!),
but not by ANY of the rival theories.]
It is interesting to me that the awe of
encountering the Angel of YHWH did NOT stop them from engaging
in some reflective work. For example, when Jacob wrestles with
the Angel of YHWH in Gen 32, he is amazed that he saw 'God face
to face, yet my life was spared'.
And in Exodus, Moses is
consistently warned that if anyone sees YHWH's face, he will
die--yet Moses speaks face-to-face with YHWH frequently (cf
33.20 with 33.11).
The Angel of YHWH seems to be
the One who is always seen face-to-face in history, whereas
YHWH Himself is never seen. A plurality-in-unity understanding
makes this a little easier to understand, but their early
efforts in this area stayed very pragmatic--they were still
alive after confronting God!
Yet the Old Testament
writers--from the end to the beginning--did not think it
blasphemous to accord this special Angel the very SAME honor,
glory, and status of God--often, in the EXACT same statement!
So, early in the OT we have Israel, upon his deathbed, blessing
the children of Joseph:
Then he blessed Joseph and
said, "May the God before whom my fathers Abraham and Isaac
walked, the God who has been my shepherd all my life to this
day, the Angel who has delivered me from all harm -- may he
bless these boys. (Gen 48:15f)
This Angel was the God of
Abraham and Issac, and was Israel's shepard. Could anything be
plainer than that statement?
And Hosea, recounting the
experience of Jacob's wrestling with the Angel, attaches the
highest title of deity in all of Scripture to this
angel:
In the womb he grasped his
brother's heel; as a man he struggled with God. He struggled
with the angel and overcame him; he wept and begged for his
favor. He found him at Bethel and talked with him there --the
LORD God Almighty, the LORD is his name of renown! (Hos
12.3-5)
This Angel was the "LORD God
Almighty"?! Could anything be plainer than that
statement?
[Excerpts taken from The
Christian Think
Tank-http://www.christian-thinktank.com/]
Top of page
|